<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would Google Ever Consider Buying A Wireless Carrier?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tmonews.com/2010/02/would-google-ever-consider-buying-a-wireless-carrier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/02/would-google-ever-consider-buying-a-wireless-carrier/</link>
	<description>Unofficial T-Mobile Blog, News, Videos, Articles and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augie</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/02/would-google-ever-consider-buying-a-wireless-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-56387</link>
		<dc:creator>Augie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9455#comment-56387</guid>
		<description>g-mobile got a nice ring to it lol i still will and always be am android fanboy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>g-mobile got a nice ring to it lol i still will and always be am android fanboy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GUYMOBILE</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/02/would-google-ever-consider-buying-a-wireless-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-50754</link>
		<dc:creator>GUYMOBILE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9455#comment-50754</guid>
		<description>I want GOOGLE to buy T-moible.. can&#039;t wait to see what will happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want GOOGLE to buy T-moible.. can&#8217;t wait to see what will happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dom</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/02/would-google-ever-consider-buying-a-wireless-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-49663</link>
		<dc:creator>Dom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9455#comment-49663</guid>
		<description>Wow. The comments some people come up with truly amaze me. Someone earlier made a great point as to the whole Google is evil thing. Do we not forget we live in America? The land where your government is keeping tabs on you to &quot;protect your interests&quot;. The same place where people are fired at work for what goes on social networking sites and for tracking email, IM&#039;s and browsing history of employees. This notion of Google infringing on people&#039;s privacy is outdated. They at least take the info and deliver useful content with it. They provide good services for free using the revenue they generate from this. They&#039;re pretty good at updating their products when things go wrong or when they have good ideas to benefit people. Yes their people and overall a company like any other, so mistakes will be made. I don&#039;t think buying T-mobile will truly benefit them as much as perfecting the Android OS and pushing to every carrier. On the other hand, if they did buy T-Mobile US you can be sure they will change the way US wireless carriers are forced to operate. We have grown so used to crap from the big 4 that we get suspicious of any chance at a different environment. T-mobile has great customer service, a decent phone offering, and a strategy that involves getting feedback from its customers to actually enhance their services. Maybe its just me, but I like that as opposed to companies spending millions on advertising campaigns when both have glaring issues (AT&amp;T and Verizon). Either way the current carrier model is in trouble since people are tired of contracts, crappy service and very few real benefits from their carrier. Google benefits my life and it&#039;d take a lot more than Google and T-Mobile to make Skynet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. The comments some people come up with truly amaze me. Someone earlier made a great point as to the whole Google is evil thing. Do we not forget we live in America? The land where your government is keeping tabs on you to &#8220;protect your interests&#8221;. The same place where people are fired at work for what goes on social networking sites and for tracking email, IM&#8217;s and browsing history of employees. This notion of Google infringing on people&#8217;s privacy is outdated. They at least take the info and deliver useful content with it. They provide good services for free using the revenue they generate from this. They&#8217;re pretty good at updating their products when things go wrong or when they have good ideas to benefit people. Yes their people and overall a company like any other, so mistakes will be made. I don&#8217;t think buying T-mobile will truly benefit them as much as perfecting the Android OS and pushing to every carrier. On the other hand, if they did buy T-Mobile US you can be sure they will change the way US wireless carriers are forced to operate. We have grown so used to crap from the big 4 that we get suspicious of any chance at a different environment. T-mobile has great customer service, a decent phone offering, and a strategy that involves getting feedback from its customers to actually enhance their services. Maybe its just me, but I like that as opposed to companies spending millions on advertising campaigns when both have glaring issues (AT&amp;T and Verizon). Either way the current carrier model is in trouble since people are tired of contracts, crappy service and very few real benefits from their carrier. Google benefits my life and it&#8217;d take a lot more than Google and T-Mobile to make Skynet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ItsMichaelNotMike</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/02/would-google-ever-consider-buying-a-wireless-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-48892</link>
		<dc:creator>ItsMichaelNotMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9455#comment-48892</guid>
		<description>Well I coined the phrase that what Google wants to sell is a new category of phone, the &quot;AdPhone.&quot;  

The AdPhone is consistent with the emphasis of Google&#039;s business, which is selling advertising to third parties, using us as the appeal (&quot;Advertise with Google and you will have access to potential customers interested in YOUR business, customers using the full range of Google&#039;s services and even our new AdPhone.&quot;) 

Because advertising is Google&#039;s core business, IMHO Google won&#039;t ever get into businesses other than what they are experts at:  Internet advertising.

I suspect the Nexus 1 is a very small experiment into branching out, but I also suspect that Google is now saying &quot;Screw this.&quot;  LOL.  I don&#039;t think Google is inclined to stray into other industries, especially those that require significant levels of customer service, which handset sales and carrier service would require.

Wireless services would require Google to operate with its pants pulled down, so to speak.  Google does not operate that way.  It is a fact that Google operates in a very secretive manner.  (Its AdSense program has been heavily criticized because Google makes it impossible to contact them for any reason.  You can&#039;t e-mail or call them.  If you go to your AdSense account page Google does not provide any way to meaningfully contact them.)

Selling phone and wireless services would be a nightmare for Google because among others, that would put govt. regulators watching Google&#039;s every move.  They don&#039;t need or want that headache (look what happened with the current flap over the ETF fees).

So I don&#039;t see Google opening themselves up to additional scrutiny, hassles and headaches (that come from dealing with the public).

Also, does anyone have any evidence that getting into the wireless industry is a great move nowadays?  I suspect not.  To me this is a good time to fold up one&#039;s tent and put one&#039;s money into something else.  

There&#039;s a price war between the big boys, handset sales are way down, the economy sucks so people are tightening belts and there&#039;s uncertainty on who will end up where.

I dunno about you, but it looks to me like buying a wireless service is like getting a dog with lots of fleas.  This is a time for Google to say &quot;Hell no, go away, I&#039;m not interested,&quot; unless Google could buy T-Mo at 10 cents on the dollar of its value.

So that&#039;s it, the industry sucks,  Google knows nothing about running a wireless company, and they would be getting into an area completely foreign to what they are experts at.  

Google is best served by sticking to what they know.

Look at the user agreements you digitally sign when you use anything that Google provides for free, such as YouTube, Google Earth, Search, Chrome, etc.  Here is an example of Chrome:

Information website operators receive when you visit a site using Google Chrome
___________

Sites that you visit using Google Chrome will automatically receive standard log information similar to that received by Google. These sites may also set their own cookies or use web storage on your machine... 

Information stored on your computer when you use Google Chrome
____________

Google Chrome records useful information about your browsing history. This includes:

•Basic browsing history information: the URLs of pages that you visit, a cache file of text from those pages, and a list of some IP addresses linked from pages that you visit.

•A searchable index of most pages you visit (except for secure pages with &quot;https&quot; web addresses, such as some bank pages)

•Thumbnail-sized screen shots of most pages you visit

•Cookies or web storage data deposited on your machine by websites you visit

•A record of downloads you have made from websites&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I coined the phrase that what Google wants to sell is a new category of phone, the &#8220;AdPhone.&#8221;  </p>
<p>The AdPhone is consistent with the emphasis of Google&#8217;s business, which is selling advertising to third parties, using us as the appeal (&#8220;Advertise with Google and you will have access to potential customers interested in YOUR business, customers using the full range of Google&#8217;s services and even our new AdPhone.&#8221;) </p>
<p>Because advertising is Google&#8217;s core business, IMHO Google won&#8217;t ever get into businesses other than what they are experts at:  Internet advertising.</p>
<p>I suspect the Nexus 1 is a very small experiment into branching out, but I also suspect that Google is now saying &#8220;Screw this.&#8221;  LOL.  I don&#8217;t think Google is inclined to stray into other industries, especially those that require significant levels of customer service, which handset sales and carrier service would require.</p>
<p>Wireless services would require Google to operate with its pants pulled down, so to speak.  Google does not operate that way.  It is a fact that Google operates in a very secretive manner.  (Its AdSense program has been heavily criticized because Google makes it impossible to contact them for any reason.  You can&#8217;t e-mail or call them.  If you go to your AdSense account page Google does not provide any way to meaningfully contact them.)</p>
<p>Selling phone and wireless services would be a nightmare for Google because among others, that would put govt. regulators watching Google&#8217;s every move.  They don&#8217;t need or want that headache (look what happened with the current flap over the ETF fees).</p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t see Google opening themselves up to additional scrutiny, hassles and headaches (that come from dealing with the public).</p>
<p>Also, does anyone have any evidence that getting into the wireless industry is a great move nowadays?  I suspect not.  To me this is a good time to fold up one&#8217;s tent and put one&#8217;s money into something else.  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a price war between the big boys, handset sales are way down, the economy sucks so people are tightening belts and there&#8217;s uncertainty on who will end up where.</p>
<p>I dunno about you, but it looks to me like buying a wireless service is like getting a dog with lots of fleas.  This is a time for Google to say &#8220;Hell no, go away, I&#8217;m not interested,&#8221; unless Google could buy T-Mo at 10 cents on the dollar of its value.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s it, the industry sucks,  Google knows nothing about running a wireless company, and they would be getting into an area completely foreign to what they are experts at.  </p>
<p>Google is best served by sticking to what they know.</p>
<p>Look at the user agreements you digitally sign when you use anything that Google provides for free, such as YouTube, Google Earth, Search, Chrome, etc.  Here is an example of Chrome:</p>
<p>Information website operators receive when you visit a site using Google Chrome<br />
___________</p>
<p>Sites that you visit using Google Chrome will automatically receive standard log information similar to that received by Google. These sites may also set their own cookies or use web storage on your machine&#8230; </p>
<p>Information stored on your computer when you use Google Chrome<br />
____________</p>
<p>Google Chrome records useful information about your browsing history. This includes:</p>
<p>•Basic browsing history information: the URLs of pages that you visit, a cache file of text from those pages, and a list of some IP addresses linked from pages that you visit.</p>
<p>•A searchable index of most pages you visit (except for secure pages with &#8220;https&#8221; web addresses, such as some bank pages)</p>
<p>•Thumbnail-sized screen shots of most pages you visit</p>
<p>•Cookies or web storage data deposited on your machine by websites you visit</p>
<p>•A record of downloads you have made from websites&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mockerfab4</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/02/would-google-ever-consider-buying-a-wireless-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-48297</link>
		<dc:creator>Mockerfab4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9455#comment-48297</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m mixed about this. In some ways, Google is good and bad. Good in that they would truly provide an innovative and distinctly different business model then the other 3 other carriers. Google Voice on cell phones would totally shake up the industry, which would be great for consumers. Bad in that I&#039;m fearful that they would mostly have Android based phones. Sorry, I gave Android a good college try and hated it so much! I&#039;m currently playing the wait and see game with Tmo. I&#039;m off contract right now and things are a bit shaky in the direction that Tmo is going, that I can be easily swayed from one carrier to another right now, dependent on their phone offerings and price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m mixed about this. In some ways, Google is good and bad. Good in that they would truly provide an innovative and distinctly different business model then the other 3 other carriers. Google Voice on cell phones would totally shake up the industry, which would be great for consumers. Bad in that I&#8217;m fearful that they would mostly have Android based phones. Sorry, I gave Android a good college try and hated it so much! I&#8217;m currently playing the wait and see game with Tmo. I&#8217;m off contract right now and things are a bit shaky in the direction that Tmo is going, that I can be easily swayed from one carrier to another right now, dependent on their phone offerings and price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/02/would-google-ever-consider-buying-a-wireless-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-48198</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9455#comment-48198</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to see T-Mobile change in to anybody elses hands, I would be okay with it if WIND Mobile Canada bought T-Mobile and offered free Canada-USA Roaming on all their plans tho that would be cool because they use the same frequency</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to see T-Mobile change in to anybody elses hands, I would be okay with it if WIND Mobile Canada bought T-Mobile and offered free Canada-USA Roaming on all their plans tho that would be cool because they use the same frequency</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voiceofreason</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/02/would-google-ever-consider-buying-a-wireless-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-48190</link>
		<dc:creator>Voiceofreason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 04:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9455#comment-48190</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I do not see Google taking any part of T-mobile, they have too much invested the Android product with other carriers.  

What I do see is Comcast (or whatever they&#039;re called today) jumping all over this.  They have been looking to get into the mobile services and this may be their chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I do not see Google taking any part of T-mobile, they have too much invested the Android product with other carriers.  </p>
<p>What I do see is Comcast (or whatever they&#8217;re called today) jumping all over this.  They have been looking to get into the mobile services and this may be their chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zazou</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/02/would-google-ever-consider-buying-a-wireless-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-48175</link>
		<dc:creator>zazou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9455#comment-48175</guid>
		<description>I am sure someone would come up with a mobile ad blocker..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure someone would come up with a mobile ad blocker..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zazou</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/02/would-google-ever-consider-buying-a-wireless-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-48174</link>
		<dc:creator>zazou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9455#comment-48174</guid>
		<description>I killed my nexus one because Google was able to activate the video camera and upload my life to you tube......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I killed my nexus one because Google was able to activate the video camera and upload my life to you tube&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tito</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/02/would-google-ever-consider-buying-a-wireless-carrier/comment-page-1/#comment-48163</link>
		<dc:creator>Tito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9455#comment-48163</guid>
		<description>G-Mobile, anyone?

I think it would be good.

Ad-supported calls? Not likely. Ads while randomly going through your phonebook, web, etc? Yeah, that I can see... IF you choose the phone/service for free.

Or you can pay like you do now for no ads.

That would be a win-win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G-Mobile, anyone?</p>
<p>I think it would be good.</p>
<p>Ad-supported calls? Not likely. Ads while randomly going through your phonebook, web, etc? Yeah, that I can see&#8230; IF you choose the phone/service for free.</p>
<p>Or you can pay like you do now for no ads.</p>
<p>That would be a win-win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

