<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MyTouch 3G 1.2 Images Hit Our Inbox, Looks Exactly Like Version 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tmonews.com/2010/01/mytouch3g-1-2-images-hit-our-inbox-looks-exactly-like-version-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/01/mytouch3g-1-2-images-hit-our-inbox-looks-exactly-like-version-1/</link>
	<description>Unofficial T-Mobile Blog, News, Videos, Articles and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DannyDarko</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/01/mytouch3g-1-2-images-hit-our-inbox-looks-exactly-like-version-1/comment-page-1/#comment-44553</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyDarko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 03:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9056#comment-44553</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why maybe it&#039;s a test model but the top of the phone looks warped like a bad KIRF, it&#039;s just off. Maybe, I am being to retentive but, whatever,I already have the old MT3 I use for tweaking I am not gonna get this anyways, just let me know if my perception is off or if I am right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why maybe it&#8217;s a test model but the top of the phone looks warped like a bad KIRF, it&#8217;s just off. Maybe, I am being to retentive but, whatever,I already have the old MT3 I use for tweaking I am not gonna get this anyways, just let me know if my perception is off or if I am right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/01/mytouch3g-1-2-images-hit-our-inbox-looks-exactly-like-version-1/comment-page-1/#comment-44450</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9056#comment-44450</guid>
		<description>You are welcome!! Thanks for reading!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are welcome!! Thanks for reading!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hec</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/01/mytouch3g-1-2-images-hit-our-inbox-looks-exactly-like-version-1/comment-page-1/#comment-44447</link>
		<dc:creator>hec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9056#comment-44447</guid>
		<description>just wanted to recap on this, seems buy the info that tmonews has on the specs on the finder compair to the my touch 3g is way better then the info thats on the tmobile site, just want to add and say always thank you tmonews for the great info you guys always provide even if its some times bad news lol,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just wanted to recap on this, seems buy the info that tmonews has on the specs on the finder compair to the my touch 3g is way better then the info thats on the tmobile site, just want to add and say always thank you tmonews for the great info you guys always provide even if its some times bad news lol,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ultravision</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/01/mytouch3g-1-2-images-hit-our-inbox-looks-exactly-like-version-1/comment-page-1/#comment-44317</link>
		<dc:creator>ultravision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 23:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9056#comment-44317</guid>
		<description>This device is a PVT32A device and has 288mb of ram. this is a big step up from the 192mb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This device is a PVT32A device and has 288mb of ram. this is a big step up from the 192mb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/01/mytouch3g-1-2-images-hit-our-inbox-looks-exactly-like-version-1/comment-page-1/#comment-44309</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9056#comment-44309</guid>
		<description>whtat the hell tmobile i just got mytouch a few weeks ago now the new mytouch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whtat the hell tmobile i just got mytouch a few weeks ago now the new mytouch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBLmobileG1</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/01/mytouch3g-1-2-images-hit-our-inbox-looks-exactly-like-version-1/comment-page-1/#comment-44306</link>
		<dc:creator>JBLmobileG1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 22:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9056#comment-44306</guid>
		<description>What a joke.  Tmobile releases the same phone with a 3.5mm jack and calls it MyTouch 3G 1.2?  I don&#039;t understand why the jack wasn&#039;t standard on the first phone to begin with.  But maybe it was because of what I talked about on a different post.  Added something extra to make that extra money.  In this case however I doubt they will get much extra except for some currently pissed of MyTouch customers.  I can see how anyone who wanted to MyTouch but wasn&#039;t able to pick one up at the time may want this... but even so with this being 6 months old there is already talk of much better phones coming our way... and one already being out (the Nexus One).  Unless Tmobile rids all of the older models of the MyTouch ( I am talking between $75 to $100 with a contract) then release the new version at $100-$150 I don&#039;t see this thing taking off.  It will need to be less than the Fender version because with that one you are paying for the 16GB card and its &quot;colectors item&quot; status.  All they had to do was put in a better processor with more ram and then it would have been worth a look.  I like the idea of the 3.5mm jack (should be standard on all phones) but that doesn&#039;t make it a phone worth re-releasing after 6 months.  BTW what ever happened to the slider that was shown way back with a keyboard that they called the G1v2?  That phone... if it had the right specs... would be worth looking into and possibly upgrading to in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a joke.  Tmobile releases the same phone with a 3.5mm jack and calls it MyTouch 3G 1.2?  I don&#8217;t understand why the jack wasn&#8217;t standard on the first phone to begin with.  But maybe it was because of what I talked about on a different post.  Added something extra to make that extra money.  In this case however I doubt they will get much extra except for some currently pissed of MyTouch customers.  I can see how anyone who wanted to MyTouch but wasn&#8217;t able to pick one up at the time may want this&#8230; but even so with this being 6 months old there is already talk of much better phones coming our way&#8230; and one already being out (the Nexus One).  Unless Tmobile rids all of the older models of the MyTouch ( I am talking between $75 to $100 with a contract) then release the new version at $100-$150 I don&#8217;t see this thing taking off.  It will need to be less than the Fender version because with that one you are paying for the 16GB card and its &#8220;colectors item&#8221; status.  All they had to do was put in a better processor with more ram and then it would have been worth a look.  I like the idea of the 3.5mm jack (should be standard on all phones) but that doesn&#8217;t make it a phone worth re-releasing after 6 months.  BTW what ever happened to the slider that was shown way back with a keyboard that they called the G1v2?  That phone&#8230; if it had the right specs&#8230; would be worth looking into and possibly upgrading to in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/01/mytouch3g-1-2-images-hit-our-inbox-looks-exactly-like-version-1/comment-page-1/#comment-44286</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9056#comment-44286</guid>
		<description>Yep, those pics are from an ebay auction. It says it was a vendor test phoned</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, those pics are from an ebay auction. It says it was a vendor test phoned</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevenG</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/01/mytouch3g-1-2-images-hit-our-inbox-looks-exactly-like-version-1/comment-page-1/#comment-44284</link>
		<dc:creator>StevenG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9056#comment-44284</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say I&#039;m unimpressed, but it&#039;s Version 1.2, not 2.0.  If it were 2.0, I&#039;d expect a lot more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say I&#8217;m unimpressed, but it&#8217;s Version 1.2, not 2.0.  If it were 2.0, I&#8217;d expect a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Entrekin</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/01/mytouch3g-1-2-images-hit-our-inbox-looks-exactly-like-version-1/comment-page-1/#comment-44283</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Entrekin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9056#comment-44283</guid>
		<description>Oh, sorry about that!  It looked fine to me, but maybe only because I&#039;m using my own computer or something?  It&#039;s in my cache?

Regardless, I hadn&#039;t thought whoever had sent it had told you.  I was only posting for information, and I hope it didn&#039;t appear otherwise.  Nice link addition in the OP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, sorry about that!  It looked fine to me, but maybe only because I&#8217;m using my own computer or something?  It&#8217;s in my cache?</p>
<p>Regardless, I hadn&#8217;t thought whoever had sent it had told you.  I was only posting for information, and I hope it didn&#8217;t appear otherwise.  Nice link addition in the OP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2010/01/mytouch3g-1-2-images-hit-our-inbox-looks-exactly-like-version-1/comment-page-1/#comment-44281</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=9056#comment-44281</guid>
		<description>No it didn&#039;t, but I added in something that did into the main post. Oh well, the link is up now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it didn&#8217;t, but I added in something that did into the main post. Oh well, the link is up now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

