<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Phone As Early As January 5th?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tmonews.com/2009/12/google-phone-as-early-as-january-5th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/12/google-phone-as-early-as-january-5th/</link>
	<description>Unofficial T-Mobile Blog, News, Videos, Articles and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: techfuzz</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/12/google-phone-as-early-as-january-5th/comment-page-1/#comment-37279</link>
		<dc:creator>techfuzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=8132#comment-37279</guid>
		<description>I just started randomly typing in urls and discovered that http://www.google.com/phone/ is reporting a 404 error.  While that sounds like nothing (and it certainly may be just that), check out how different that url&#039;s 404 error message is compared to say http://www.google.com/random/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just started randomly typing in urls and discovered that <a href="http://www.google.com/phone/" >http://www.google.com/phone/</a> is reporting a 404 error.  While that sounds like nothing (and it certainly may be just that), check out how different that url&#8217;s 404 error message is compared to say <a href="http://www.google.com/random/" >http://www.google.com/random/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HTC Nexus One Gets Unboxed &#124; TmoNews - Unofficial T-Mobile Blog - News, Videos, Articles and more</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/12/google-phone-as-early-as-january-5th/comment-page-1/#comment-36863</link>
		<dc:creator>HTC Nexus One Gets Unboxed &#124; TmoNews - Unofficial T-Mobile Blog - News, Videos, Articles and more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=8132#comment-36863</guid>
		<description>[...] be the Nexus One packaging, but now we have more than just the front-side of this gorgeous device, rumored to release January 5th 2009. Thanks to a nice tweeter, who was kind enough to share the Nexus One placed in a big white box and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be the Nexus One packaging, but now we have more than just the front-side of this gorgeous device, rumored to release January 5th 2009. Thanks to a nice tweeter, who was kind enough to share the Nexus One placed in a big white box and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skritz Mcgrillz</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/12/google-phone-as-early-as-january-5th/comment-page-1/#comment-35443</link>
		<dc:creator>Skritz Mcgrillz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=8132#comment-35443</guid>
		<description>I really thought Android was ground breaking when it first came out. I was mesmerizer by the os and display.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really thought Android was ground breaking when it first came out. I was mesmerizer by the os and display.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skritz Mcgrillz</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/12/google-phone-as-early-as-january-5th/comment-page-1/#comment-35441</link>
		<dc:creator>Skritz Mcgrillz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=8132#comment-35441</guid>
		<description>You guys are nutz to think any company is going to give away free phones. I mean really google is no different from any corporation. Get your heads on right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are nutz to think any company is going to give away free phones. I mean really google is no different from any corporation. Get your heads on right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skritz Mcgrillz</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/12/google-phone-as-early-as-january-5th/comment-page-1/#comment-35440</link>
		<dc:creator>Skritz Mcgrillz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=8132#comment-35440</guid>
		<description>Whoopie Golbert, Jessie James, Avril? Where they serious. What happen to Dewayne Wade? Oh and can we get rid of Cathrine Zeta? I mean really what has she done in the past 10 years?

At&amp;t is no better with Luke Wilson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoopie Golbert, Jessie James, Avril? Where they serious. What happen to Dewayne Wade? Oh and can we get rid of Cathrine Zeta? I mean really what has she done in the past 10 years?</p>
<p>At&amp;t is no better with Luke Wilson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skritz Mcgritz</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/12/google-phone-as-early-as-january-5th/comment-page-1/#comment-35437</link>
		<dc:creator>Skritz Mcgritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=8132#comment-35437</guid>
		<description>Whoopie Golbert, Jessie James, Avril? Where they serious. What happen to Dewayne Wade? Oh and can we get rid of Cathrine Zeta? I mean really what has she done in the past 10 years?

At&amp;t is no better with Luke Wilson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoopie Golbert, Jessie James, Avril? Where they serious. What happen to Dewayne Wade? Oh and can we get rid of Cathrine Zeta? I mean really what has she done in the past 10 years?</p>
<p>At&amp;t is no better with Luke Wilson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skritz Mcgritz</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/12/google-phone-as-early-as-january-5th/comment-page-1/#comment-35435</link>
		<dc:creator>Skritz Mcgritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=8132#comment-35435</guid>
		<description>@ CO_yeti
Your so right it doesn&#039;t make sense from a business stand point. 

@ Miguel
Google would not subsidize a phone for a wireless company because there would be nothing in it for them. That is so ass-backwards. They wouldn&#039;t use the money they make from advertising to discount a phone, they would pocket it. Duh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ CO_yeti<br />
Your so right it doesn&#8217;t make sense from a business stand point. </p>
<p>@ Miguel<br />
Google would not subsidize a phone for a wireless company because there would be nothing in it for them. That is so ass-backwards. They wouldn&#8217;t use the money they make from advertising to discount a phone, they would pocket it. Duh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aquaitious</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/12/google-phone-as-early-as-january-5th/comment-page-1/#comment-35112</link>
		<dc:creator>aquaitious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=8132#comment-35112</guid>
		<description>I was/still am hoping for that $199.99 sweet spot! I hope the battery isn&#039;t crappy, otherwise, what&#039;s the point? The G1 is unacceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was/still am hoping for that $199.99 sweet spot! I hope the battery isn&#8217;t crappy, otherwise, what&#8217;s the point? The G1 is unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FILA</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/12/google-phone-as-early-as-january-5th/comment-page-1/#comment-35091</link>
		<dc:creator>FILA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=8132#comment-35091</guid>
		<description>200, damn, no need to upgrade your contract really. Btu one thing I hate about this phone, NO KEYBOARD!!! Come on

G1v2 anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>200, damn, no need to upgrade your contract really. Btu one thing I hate about this phone, NO KEYBOARD!!! Come on</p>
<p>G1v2 anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maddy</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/12/google-phone-as-early-as-january-5th/comment-page-1/#comment-35060</link>
		<dc:creator>Maddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=8132#comment-35060</guid>
		<description>Exactly. I&#039;m sure TMo knew about this phone (and many more like this) already when they thought about the EM+ plans. It makes perfect sense, too perfect!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. I&#8217;m sure TMo knew about this phone (and many more like this) already when they thought about the EM+ plans. It makes perfect sense, too perfect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

