<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung Behold 2 Passes FCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tmonews.com/2009/09/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/09/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc/</link>
	<description>Unofficial T-Mobile Blog, News, Videos, Articles and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung Behold 2 Pics &#124; TmoNews - Unofficial T-Mobile Blog - News, Videos, Articles and more</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/09/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-20500</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung Behold 2 Pics &#124; TmoNews - Unofficial T-Mobile Blog - News, Videos, Articles and more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=5928#comment-20500</guid>
		<description>[...] getting approved by the FCC and then introducing itself to the public officially, the Behold 2 poses for the camera! The guys [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] getting approved by the FCC and then introducing itself to the public officially, the Behold 2 poses for the camera! The guys [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/09/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-19766</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=5928#comment-19766</guid>
		<description>Glad it&#039;s Android, as being previous owner of Behold, the TouchWiz interface was okay, but not great. As for dual band thats bad for anyone who goes international, but I don&#039;t, I might just get this one or Moto Cliq, the battery is what worries me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad it&#8217;s Android, as being previous owner of Behold, the TouchWiz interface was okay, but not great. As for dual band thats bad for anyone who goes international, but I don&#8217;t, I might just get this one or Moto Cliq, the battery is what worries me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/09/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-19640</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=5928#comment-19640</guid>
		<description>seriously screw the galaxy lite WE WANT the ORIGINAL GALAXY!!! this one sucks!!! 1000 mAh battery? come on samsung!!! i&#039;m a big fan of samsung but this one is just not samsung worthy... seriously... we want the i7500 GALAXY!!! just like those europeans have!!! why can&#039;t we get a phone like them????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seriously screw the galaxy lite WE WANT the ORIGINAL GALAXY!!! this one sucks!!! 1000 mAh battery? come on samsung!!! i&#8217;m a big fan of samsung but this one is just not samsung worthy&#8230; seriously&#8230; we want the i7500 GALAXY!!! just like those europeans have!!! why can&#8217;t we get a phone like them????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fangirl</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/09/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-19504</link>
		<dc:creator>Fangirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=5928#comment-19504</guid>
		<description>(Glaxaxy Lite)

Is it really called the Glaxaxy? That would be kinda cool..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Glaxaxy Lite)</p>
<p>Is it really called the Glaxaxy? That would be kinda cool..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/09/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-19375</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 04:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=5928#comment-19375</guid>
		<description>since there a behold 2 is there going to be samsung Memoir 2 as the galxey?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since there a behold 2 is there going to be samsung Memoir 2 as the galxey?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sflex</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/09/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-19358</link>
		<dc:creator>sflex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=5928#comment-19358</guid>
		<description>dual band? what kind of shit is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dual band? what kind of shit is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/09/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-19348</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=5928#comment-19348</guid>
		<description>Well the first Behold sucked, I&#039;m sure this one will too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the first Behold sucked, I&#8217;m sure this one will too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FILA</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/09/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-19345</link>
		<dc:creator>FILA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=5928#comment-19345</guid>
		<description>ewwwww</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ewwwww</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmolover</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/09/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-19325</link>
		<dc:creator>tmolover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=5928#comment-19325</guid>
		<description>n900 here i come</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>n900 here i come</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadProfessor</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/09/samsung-behold-2-passes-fcc/comment-page-1/#comment-19322</link>
		<dc:creator>MadProfessor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tmonews.com/?p=5928#comment-19322</guid>
		<description>This is demonstrating exactly why we needs advancement in battery technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is demonstrating exactly why we needs advancement in battery technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

