<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sidekick 2009 in the wild, sort of</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tmonews.com/2009/02/sidekick-2009-in-the-wild-sort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/02/sidekick-2009-in-the-wild-sort-of/</link>
	<description>Unofficial T-Mobile Blog, News, Videos, Articles and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: siricon</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/02/sidekick-2009-in-the-wild-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-13490</link>
		<dc:creator>siricon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ec2-174-129-243-160.compute-1.amazonaws.com/?p=2060#comment-13490</guid>
		<description>i have to admit, i would actually but this phone . im not a big fan of the sidekick because of the fact that most people only buy it for easy text messaging . when the sidekick 2008 came out, i was dissapointed that it didn&#039;t have a flash like the LX .
the 2009 seems like an intergration of the 2008 and LX feature wise.
and i really hope it doesn&#039;t have a touchscreen . the sidekick isnt a touch screen phone . if you want a touch screen phone then get the G1 or iPhone . the touchscreen would defy the whole purpose and use of what the sidekick offers to it&#039;s clients . also, if it didnt have a swivel screen . it would be honestly retarded . the main thing people recognize about SK&#039;s are the swivel screen and the keyboard . without the swivel screen, can you still honestly call it a sidekick ?
this phone would probably be on my top 5 phones to get definately ranging 1 or 2 against the blackberry storm .

--they should put up the price and when it&#039;s going to come out . i&#039;d probably say around november or december, during the holiday rush hopefully[:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have to admit, i would actually but this phone . im not a big fan of the sidekick because of the fact that most people only buy it for easy text messaging . when the sidekick 2008 came out, i was dissapointed that it didn&#8217;t have a flash like the LX .<br />
the 2009 seems like an intergration of the 2008 and LX feature wise.<br />
and i really hope it doesn&#8217;t have a touchscreen . the sidekick isnt a touch screen phone . if you want a touch screen phone then get the G1 or iPhone . the touchscreen would defy the whole purpose and use of what the sidekick offers to it&#8217;s clients . also, if it didnt have a swivel screen . it would be honestly retarded . the main thing people recognize about SK&#8217;s are the swivel screen and the keyboard . without the swivel screen, can you still honestly call it a sidekick ?<br />
this phone would probably be on my top 5 phones to get definately ranging 1 or 2 against the blackberry storm .</p>
<p>&#8211;they should put up the price and when it&#8217;s going to come out . i&#8217;d probably say around november or december, during the holiday rush hopefully[:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekicksaregay</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/02/sidekick-2009-in-the-wild-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-13489</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekicksaregay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ec2-174-129-243-160.compute-1.amazonaws.com/?p=2060#comment-13489</guid>
		<description>And iif u didn&#039;t like the G1 its prob cuz ur not smart enuff to figure it out. BEST PHONE EVER. Not crappy like sidekick. Not gay like sidekick. And it actually has a real web browser not that joke broswer the retarded sidekick has. Yes the sidekick is GAYEST GIRL PHONE EVER. Don&#039;t bother responding or arguing with this post. I won&#039;t be back to check ur comments. Anyone who likes sidekicks is a moron who should commit suicide anyway. G1= What sidekick wishes it could be but never will. G1= iphone killer in EVERY way. G1 4 life. Sidekicks suck pp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And iif u didn&#8217;t like the G1 its prob cuz ur not smart enuff to figure it out. BEST PHONE EVER. Not crappy like sidekick. Not gay like sidekick. And it actually has a real web browser not that joke broswer the retarded sidekick has. Yes the sidekick is GAYEST GIRL PHONE EVER. Don&#8217;t bother responding or arguing with this post. I won&#8217;t be back to check ur comments. Anyone who likes sidekicks is a moron who should commit suicide anyway. G1= What sidekick wishes it could be but never will. G1= iphone killer in EVERY way. G1 4 life. Sidekicks suck pp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidekicksaregay</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/02/sidekick-2009-in-the-wild-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-13488</link>
		<dc:creator>sidekicksaregay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ec2-174-129-243-160.compute-1.amazonaws.com/?p=2060#comment-13488</guid>
		<description>Oh whooopty doo. The 15th sidekick. And it looks exactly like the 14 before it. Wow. How original. Yo the sidekick should be discontinued. Its the crappiest phone tmobile offers. Its got a crappy browser,crappy camera,crappy music player,crappy games,crappy reception,crappy design and the concept of a sidekick is waaaaaay overplayed and waaaayyyy outdated. Why even bother making these sub-par teenybopper phones? And don t gimme that crap about sidekicks being for deaf people cuz we all know noone wants to communicate with deafies anyway. That&#039;d be like having a chat with a brick wall. Yes the sidekick is the biggest piece of turd to come with a pricetag. I guess if you&#039;re 13 they might be cool. But who gives a crap what teenagers like? They&#039;re useless. Tmobile:get rid of the sidekick. You&#039;re being laughed at for still trying to sell something as retarded as that. No third party downloads. You HAVE to download only from sidekick catalog which has the crappiest ringtones and themes in it. What a piece of crap the sidekick is. If I see people using a prehistoric sidekick I beat them down.smash their sidekick and leave a pamphlet all about the G1. Get with the times. Sidekicks were cool 10 years ago. Now its all about the g1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh whooopty doo. The 15th sidekick. And it looks exactly like the 14 before it. Wow. How original. Yo the sidekick should be discontinued. Its the crappiest phone tmobile offers. Its got a crappy browser,crappy camera,crappy music player,crappy games,crappy reception,crappy design and the concept of a sidekick is waaaaaay overplayed and waaaayyyy outdated. Why even bother making these sub-par teenybopper phones? And don t gimme that crap about sidekicks being for deaf people cuz we all know noone wants to communicate with deafies anyway. That&#8217;d be like having a chat with a brick wall. Yes the sidekick is the biggest piece of turd to come with a pricetag. I guess if you&#8217;re 13 they might be cool. But who gives a crap what teenagers like? They&#8217;re useless. Tmobile:get rid of the sidekick. You&#8217;re being laughed at for still trying to sell something as retarded as that. No third party downloads. You HAVE to download only from sidekick catalog which has the crappiest ringtones and themes in it. What a piece of crap the sidekick is. If I see people using a prehistoric sidekick I beat them down.smash their sidekick and leave a pamphlet all about the G1. Get with the times. Sidekicks were cool 10 years ago. Now its all about the g1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadow13</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/02/sidekick-2009-in-the-wild-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-13487</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadow13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ec2-174-129-243-160.compute-1.amazonaws.com/?p=2060#comment-13487</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just saying if u add a touch screen to tha fone it **** up tha fone.......like wen ur try to touch that screen if u do it to hard tha screen might break off........I mean like they wud have to make a very sterdy screen to have a touch screen but that wudnt be cool wud it so **** a touch screen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just saying if u add a touch screen to tha fone it **** up tha fone&#8230;&#8230;.like wen ur try to touch that screen if u do it to hard tha screen might break off&#8230;&#8230;..I mean like they wud have to make a very sterdy screen to have a touch screen but that wudnt be cool wud it so **** a touch screen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bs87</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/02/sidekick-2009-in-the-wild-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-13485</link>
		<dc:creator>bs87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ec2-174-129-243-160.compute-1.amazonaws.com/?p=2060#comment-13485</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know when it is comming out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know when it is comming out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whatever</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/02/sidekick-2009-in-the-wild-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-13486</link>
		<dc:creator>Whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ec2-174-129-243-160.compute-1.amazonaws.com/?p=2060#comment-13486</guid>
		<description>@ kma:
&quot;I thought this would be an upgrade not so much.&quot;
Which is so confusing seeing as you&#039;re saavy to T-mo News and assumingly other gadget news.

The absolute worst thing is all these people that thought the G-series phones were going to be iPhones or Sidekicks. Nothing makes my stomach twist more than hearing someone compare the G1 to a Sidekick. Heck, I would have AVOIDED the G1 had I thought it was the next Sidekick.

If you&#039;re a Sidekick fanatic, then the ONLY &quot;upgrade&quot; for you is another Sidekick.

kma, if I had the ability or power, I would make T-mo refund you the money for your G1 and get you back a Sidekick.  The less mis-informed G1 haters there are, the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ kma:<br />
&#8220;I thought this would be an upgrade not so much.&#8221;<br />
Which is so confusing seeing as you&#8217;re saavy to T-mo News and assumingly other gadget news.</p>
<p>The absolute worst thing is all these people that thought the G-series phones were going to be iPhones or Sidekicks. Nothing makes my stomach twist more than hearing someone compare the G1 to a Sidekick. Heck, I would have AVOIDED the G1 had I thought it was the next Sidekick.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a Sidekick fanatic, then the ONLY &#8220;upgrade&#8221; for you is another Sidekick.</p>
<p>kma, if I had the ability or power, I would make T-mo refund you the money for your G1 and get you back a Sidekick.  The less mis-informed G1 haters there are, the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angelsz</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/02/sidekick-2009-in-the-wild-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-13481</link>
		<dc:creator>angelsz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 01:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ec2-174-129-243-160.compute-1.amazonaws.com/?p=2060#comment-13481</guid>
		<description>I heard dhat it wasz gonna be a touch screen . smh im soo disappointed . I soo hope itsz flipsz . can&#039;t wait for it ta come out . how much isz it anyway ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard dhat it wasz gonna be a touch screen . smh im soo disappointed . I soo hope itsz flipsz . can&#8217;t wait for it ta come out . how much isz it anyway ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kma</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/02/sidekick-2009-in-the-wild-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-13482</link>
		<dc:creator>kma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 01:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ec2-174-129-243-160.compute-1.amazonaws.com/?p=2060#comment-13482</guid>
		<description>So.....video capability? I just got the G1 and I hate it I want my sidekick its an awesome phone. I thought this would be an upgrade not so much. If sidekick had video it would be the best thing since sliced bread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;..video capability? I just got the G1 and I hate it I want my sidekick its an awesome phone. I thought this would be an upgrade not so much. If sidekick had video it would be the best thing since sliced bread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: april</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/02/sidekick-2009-in-the-wild-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-13484</link>
		<dc:creator>april</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ec2-174-129-243-160.compute-1.amazonaws.com/?p=2060#comment-13484</guid>
		<description>OMG I LIKE HOW IT SOUNDS..BUT THE COLOR ISNT TOO NICE I WANT ONE THOUGH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG I LIKE HOW IT SOUNDS..BUT THE COLOR ISNT TOO NICE I WANT ONE THOUGH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dont tase me bro</title>
		<link>http://www.tmonews.com/2009/02/sidekick-2009-in-the-wild-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-13483</link>
		<dc:creator>dont tase me bro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ec2-174-129-243-160.compute-1.amazonaws.com/?p=2060#comment-13483</guid>
		<description>I knew sticking with a sidekick through thick and thin would pay off</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew sticking with a sidekick through thick and thin would pay off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

